<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 817 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409975</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as time-barred and lacking merit. It held that the appellants were aware of the impugned orders before the claimed date and failed to justify the delay in filing the appeal. Additionally, the Tribunal found no substantial evidence of fraud or concealment to invalidate the orders, affirming the validity of the Valuation Report and Share Swap Ratio in the approved scheme of amalgamation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2021 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 817 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409975</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as time-barred and lacking merit. It held that the appellants were aware of the impugned orders before the claimed date and failed to justify the delay in filing the appeal. Additionally, the Tribunal found no substantial evidence of fraud or concealment to invalidate the orders, affirming the validity of the Valuation Report and Share Swap Ratio in the approved scheme of amalgamation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>