<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 798 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409956</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of remuneration to partners, as it was within prescribed limits and genuine. However, the disallowance of advertisement expenses was upheld due to lack of evidence supporting business purposes. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to Section 40(b) for partners&#039; remuneration and the requirement of verifiable evidence for claimed expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2021 10:08:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 798 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409956</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of remuneration to partners, as it was within prescribed limits and genuine. However, the disallowance of advertisement expenses was upheld due to lack of evidence supporting business purposes. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to Section 40(b) for partners&#039; remuneration and the requirement of verifiable evidence for claimed expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>