<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1898 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296431</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting all disallowances imposed by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A) due to the absence of identified defects in the claim or books of accounts. The judgment emphasized the requirement for justifying disallowances with specific grounds rather than arbitrary ad-hoc rates. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, leading to the deletion of the disallowance in its entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:45:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1898 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296431</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting all disallowances imposed by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A) due to the absence of identified defects in the claim or books of accounts. The judgment emphasized the requirement for justifying disallowances with specific grounds rather than arbitrary ad-hoc rates. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, leading to the deletion of the disallowance in its entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>