https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296427 The court dismissed the Stay Petition due to the absence of an amount to be stayed under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeal was disposed of based on a narrow compass and a previous Final Order. The demand for differential Central Excise duty under Section 4A was rejected, following precedent set in a prior case. The judges upheld consistency and fairness in their decision-making process. en-us Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:45:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296427 The court dismissed the Stay Petition due to the absence of an amount to be stayed under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeal was disposed of based on a narrow compass and a previous Final Order. The demand for differential Central Excise duty under Section 4A was rejected, following precedent set in a prior case. The judges upheld consistency and fairness in their decision-making process. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296427