<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1844 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296436</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Arbitrator&#039;s order, emphasizing that the issue of impleading the appellant should be decided by the Arbitrator. The Court also excluded the time taken by the appellant in proceedings to prevent termination of the Arbitrator&#039;s mandate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:45:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1844 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296436</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Arbitrator&#039;s order, emphasizing that the issue of impleading the appellant should be decided by the Arbitrator. The Court also excluded the time taken by the appellant in proceedings to prevent termination of the Arbitrator&#039;s mandate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>