https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296436 An objection to impleadment or deletion of a party in arbitral proceedings was held to fall within the arbitrator's domain, particularly where the tribunal had indicated that it could deal with the claim and the issue had not yet been finally addressed after pleadings. A challenge to such an interim position was therefore premature and the appeal was not maintainable. The court also noted that any grievance could be raised after the award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and accepted exclusion of the time spent in these proceedings for the purpose of Section 29A(4). en-us Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:45:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296436 An objection to impleadment or deletion of a party in arbitral proceedings was held to fall within the arbitrator's domain, particularly where the tribunal had indicated that it could deal with the claim and the issue had not yet been finally addressed after pleadings. A challenge to such an interim position was therefore premature and the appeal was not maintainable. The court also noted that any grievance could be raised after the award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and accepted exclusion of the time spent in these proceedings for the purpose of Section 29A(4). Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296436