https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296435 The High Court of Meghalaya dismissed the writ petition regarding the ownership claim over seized goods and the refund of sale proceeds of the confiscated goods. The court directed the petitioner to pursue the implementation of the CESTAT order by filing a motion before the tribunal, stating that the writ petition was not the suitable avenue for such relief. en-us Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:45:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296435 The High Court of Meghalaya dismissed the writ petition regarding the ownership claim over seized goods and the refund of sale proceeds of the confiscated goods. The court directed the petitioner to pursue the implementation of the CESTAT order by filing a motion before the tribunal, stating that the writ petition was not the suitable avenue for such relief. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296435