https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296424 An order dismissing a revision can be treated as final for Article 134(1)(c) if it conclusively disposes of the independent proceeding before the High Court, even though the underlying criminal trial continues. The finality inquiry focuses on the proceeding in which the order is made, not on the later merits of the prosecution. A certificate under Article 134(1)(c) is not competent where the matter turns only on facts and does not raise a substantial question of law or principle; a decision on whether a Magistrate was justified in directing a complaint under Section 476 CrPC was characterised as essentially factual. Bachawat, J. dissented, treating the order as interlocutory because guilt remained undecided. en-us Fri, 15 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:09:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296424 An order dismissing a revision can be treated as final for Article 134(1)(c) if it conclusively disposes of the independent proceeding before the High Court, even though the underlying criminal trial continues. The finality inquiry focuses on the proceeding in which the order is made, not on the later merits of the prosecution. A certificate under Article 134(1)(c) is not competent where the matter turns only on facts and does not raise a substantial question of law or principle; a decision on whether a Magistrate was justified in directing a complaint under Section 476 CrPC was characterised as essentially factual. Bachawat, J. dissented, treating the order as interlocutory because guilt remained undecided. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296424