https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296422 Gujarat HC reiterated that inherent or writ jurisdiction should not be used to quash an FIR or stop investigation at a premature stage where the complaint discloses cognizable allegations of forged and fabricated documents. The Court held that a prosecution should not be stifled before relevant material is collected, and that the existence of parallel civil proceedings or allegations of mala fides does not by itself justify interference with the criminal process. It also found no concrete material showing illegality, bias, or irregularity to warrant transfer of investigation to a higher authority. The criminal process was therefore permitted to continue. en-us Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:50:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296422 Gujarat HC reiterated that inherent or writ jurisdiction should not be used to quash an FIR or stop investigation at a premature stage where the complaint discloses cognizable allegations of forged and fabricated documents. The Court held that a prosecution should not be stifled before relevant material is collected, and that the existence of parallel civil proceedings or allegations of mala fides does not by itself justify interference with the criminal process. It also found no concrete material showing illegality, bias, or irregularity to warrant transfer of investigation to a higher authority. The criminal process was therefore permitted to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296422