<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1171 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the share premium account cannot be treated as accumulated profits for deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling allowing the assessee to claim deduction under section 24(b) for interest on term loan, emphasizing the necessity for the Assessing Officer to verify facts accurately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:47:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1171 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the share premium account cannot be treated as accumulated profits for deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling allowing the assessee to claim deduction under section 24(b) for interest on term loan, emphasizing the necessity for the Assessing Officer to verify facts accurately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>