<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 776 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409934</link>
    <description>A public officer exercising statutory registration powers must verify mandatory particulars and conduct the enquiry required by the sales tax law before granting registration. Where registration is issued on an incomplete application without the prescribed scrutiny, the lapse is not a mere error of judgment but misconduct, because departmental misconduct includes conduct prejudicial to public revenue even without personal gain or corrupt motive. A charge alleging failure to verify the application, investigate the particulars and follow directions was held sufficiently definite and distinct. On that basis, the disciplinary punishment was restored and interference was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:13:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 776 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409934</link>
      <description>A public officer exercising statutory registration powers must verify mandatory particulars and conduct the enquiry required by the sales tax law before granting registration. Where registration is issued on an incomplete application without the prescribed scrutiny, the lapse is not a mere error of judgment but misconduct, because departmental misconduct includes conduct prejudicial to public revenue even without personal gain or corrupt motive. A charge alleging failure to verify the application, investigate the particulars and follow directions was held sufficiently definite and distinct. On that basis, the disciplinary punishment was restored and interference was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>