<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 775 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409933</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer (AO) due to the lack of detailed arguments and persistent non-compliance by the assessee. The Tribunal found merit in the assessee&#039;s argument regarding share valuation based on market value of land and subscription by family members. The AO was instructed to reevaluate the issue considering facts and law, granting the assessee another opportunity to substantiate its case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:13:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 775 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409933</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer (AO) due to the lack of detailed arguments and persistent non-compliance by the assessee. The Tribunal found merit in the assessee&#039;s argument regarding share valuation based on market value of land and subscription by family members. The AO was instructed to reevaluate the issue considering facts and law, granting the assessee another opportunity to substantiate its case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>