<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1229 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296406</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified income from managing an IT Park as &quot;business income,&quot; directed reassessment for interest expenditure under the head of &quot;business,&quot; treated income from IT Park operations as &quot;business income,&quot; and held share premium account balance not as accumulated profits for sec.2(22)(e) purposes. The appeals by both parties were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:12:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1229 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296406</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified income from managing an IT Park as &quot;business income,&quot; directed reassessment for interest expenditure under the head of &quot;business,&quot; treated income from IT Park operations as &quot;business income,&quot; and held share premium account balance not as accumulated profits for sec.2(22)(e) purposes. The appeals by both parties were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>