https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296414 The High Court rectified an incorrect description in a list of fresh cases and addressed the interception and seizure of goods due to the absence of an e-way bill. Despite the initial lack of the e-way bill during transportation, the dealer promptly provided it to the authorities. As the only issue was the non-production of the e-way bill, the Court ordered the immediate release of the goods and vehicle upon the provision of suitable security, excluding cash and bank guarantee. This case highlights the necessity of complying with statutory requirements and the importance of timely procedural adherence to avoid unnecessary delays. en-us Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:12:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296414 The High Court rectified an incorrect description in a list of fresh cases and addressed the interception and seizure of goods due to the absence of an e-way bill. Despite the initial lack of the e-way bill during transportation, the dealer promptly provided it to the authorities. As the only issue was the non-production of the e-way bill, the Court ordered the immediate release of the goods and vehicle upon the provision of suitable security, excluding cash and bank guarantee. This case highlights the necessity of complying with statutory requirements and the importance of timely procedural adherence to avoid unnecessary delays. Case-Laws GST Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296414