<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue Authorities&#039; Evidence u/s 69B Deemed Insufficient for Addition in On-Money Transaction Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58837</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 69B - on-money transaction - the two evidence relied by the Ld. Revenue Authorities viz., the data retrieved from the Pen-drive and the admission by the vendors of the property though may have a persuasive value but will not have much substantive evidentiary value in order to make additions in the hands of the assessee. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:08:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:08:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue Authorities&#039; Evidence u/s 69B Deemed Insufficient for Addition in On-Money Transaction Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58837</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 69B - on-money transaction - the two evidence relied by the Ld. Revenue Authorities viz., the data retrieved from the Pen-drive and the admission by the vendors of the property though may have a persuasive value but will not have much substantive evidentiary value in order to make additions in the hands of the assessee. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:08:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>