https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409907 The Court confirmed the interim regular bail granted to the petitioner in a case involving alleged violations of Sections 132(1)(b) and 132(1)(c) of the Central GST Act, 2017 along with Section 20(XV) of the Integrated GST Act, 2017. Despite ongoing investigations and the petitioner's custody for 55 days, the Court found it appropriate to maintain bail, emphasizing the absence of a filed complaint or established loss of revenue. The petitioner was required to provide fresh bail bonds and continue cooperating with the investigation. The judgment clarified that the decision pertained solely to the bail issue without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. en-us Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409907 The Court confirmed the interim regular bail granted to the petitioner in a case involving alleged violations of Sections 132(1)(b) and 132(1)(c) of the Central GST Act, 2017 along with Section 20(XV) of the Integrated GST Act, 2017. Despite ongoing investigations and the petitioner's custody for 55 days, the Court found it appropriate to maintain bail, emphasizing the absence of a filed complaint or established loss of revenue. The petitioner was required to provide fresh bail bonds and continue cooperating with the investigation. The judgment clarified that the decision pertained solely to the bail issue without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. Case-Laws GST Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409907