https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409901 The court addressed challenges against orders passed by revenue authorities under the IGST Act and CGST Act concerning goods valuation and seizure. The petitioner argued that the valuation increase was unjustified and not following proper procedures. The court allowed time for the respondents to respond and directed the petitioner to deposit tax, 50% of the penalty, and furnish security for the remaining penalty amount for the release of goods and vehicle. The court also required submission of an official order copy for verification. en-us Tue, 13 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409901 The court addressed challenges against orders passed by revenue authorities under the IGST Act and CGST Act concerning goods valuation and seizure. The petitioner argued that the valuation increase was unjustified and not following proper procedures. The court allowed time for the respondents to respond and directed the petitioner to deposit tax, 50% of the penalty, and furnish security for the remaining penalty amount for the release of goods and vehicle. The court also required submission of an official order copy for verification. Case-Laws GST Tue, 13 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409901