https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409897 The High Court allowed the criminal revision petition, setting aside the conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was acquitted due to significant contradictions in the complainant's statements, lack of evidence regarding the complainant's financial capacity, and the rebuttal of the presumption under Section 139 of the Act. The court emphasized the accused's ability to create doubt through a preponderance of probabilities. The lower courts' failure to consider these aspects rendered their judgments perverse and infirm. en-us Tue, 06 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:24:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409897 The High Court allowed the criminal revision petition, setting aside the conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was acquitted due to significant contradictions in the complainant's statements, lack of evidence regarding the complainant's financial capacity, and the rebuttal of the presumption under Section 139 of the Act. The court emphasized the accused's ability to create doubt through a preponderance of probabilities. The lower courts' failure to consider these aspects rendered their judgments perverse and infirm. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409897