<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 727 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s order that restricted the exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Section 54F in its entirety, emphasizing that the exemption should not be denied for failure to deposit the amount in the capital gains account scheme if the entire sale consideration is invested in constructing a residential house within the stipulated period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:24:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 727 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s order that restricted the exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Section 54F in its entirety, emphasizing that the exemption should not be denied for failure to deposit the amount in the capital gains account scheme if the entire sale consideration is invested in constructing a residential house within the stipulated period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>