https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296398 A complaint attacking a governmental promotion and posting decision was treated as a challenge to an administrative or policy matter, not as material disclosing corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court noted that no specific allegation of illegal gratification, undue advantage, pecuniary gain, dishonest misappropriation, or any other statutory ingredient of corruption or criminal misconduct had been made. A mere claim that another officer should have been preferred was insufficient to justify vigilance enquiry or criminal process. The forwarding order for preliminary enquiry was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, with the complaint rejected as not disclosing any offence. en-us Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:22:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296398 A complaint attacking a governmental promotion and posting decision was treated as a challenge to an administrative or policy matter, not as material disclosing corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court noted that no specific allegation of illegal gratification, undue advantage, pecuniary gain, dishonest misappropriation, or any other statutory ingredient of corruption or criminal misconduct had been made. A mere claim that another officer should have been preferred was insufficient to justify vigilance enquiry or criminal process. The forwarding order for preliminary enquiry was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, with the complaint rejected as not disclosing any offence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296398