<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1930 (4) TMI 13 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296372</link>
    <description>Certiorari is available only to correct determinations made by a body exercising judicial or quasi-judicial power, not ministerial or administrative acts. In election proceedings, where the municipal council did not adjudicate any disputed issue or resolve the validity of votes, the presiding member&#039;s role in counting ballots and declaring the elected candidate remained ministerial. The election rules permitted rejection only of a voting paper invalid on its face, such as one bearing the voter&#039;s signature or more than one cross, and conferred no authority to decide broader questions of vote validity. On that footing, the act challenged was not a judicial determination, so certiorari was not available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2021 12:39:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1930 (4) TMI 13 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296372</link>
      <description>Certiorari is available only to correct determinations made by a body exercising judicial or quasi-judicial power, not ministerial or administrative acts. In election proceedings, where the municipal council did not adjudicate any disputed issue or resolve the validity of votes, the presiding member&#039;s role in counting ballots and declaring the elected candidate remained ministerial. The election rules permitted rejection only of a voting paper invalid on its face, such as one bearing the voter&#039;s signature or more than one cross, and conferred no authority to decide broader questions of vote validity. On that footing, the act challenged was not a judicial determination, so certiorari was not available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>