https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409845 The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to sustain the addition of Rs. 17,20,000 as unexplained cash found during a search, citing lack of evidence and inconsistent statements by the assessee. The Tribunal also noted the invalidity of the revised return due to late filing and dismissed the addition of Rs. 2,00,000 for agricultural land purchase as not pressed by the assessee. The appeal was dismissed on 15th July, 2021. en-us Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jul 2021 07:28:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409845 The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to sustain the addition of Rs. 17,20,000 as unexplained cash found during a search, citing lack of evidence and inconsistent statements by the assessee. The Tribunal also noted the invalidity of the revised return due to late filing and dismissed the addition of Rs. 2,00,000 for agricultural land purchase as not pressed by the assessee. The appeal was dismissed on 15th July, 2021. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409845