<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 679 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409837</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the issue back to the Assessing Officer, directing the appellant to produce ledger accounts of the sundry creditors to show that sales were accounted for against the credits received. If the sales were accounted for, the addition under Section 68 would result in double addition, which is not permissible. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes with directions to the Assessing Officer to decide the issue afresh in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2021 07:28:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 679 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409837</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the issue back to the Assessing Officer, directing the appellant to produce ledger accounts of the sundry creditors to show that sales were accounted for against the credits received. If the sales were accounted for, the addition under Section 68 would result in double addition, which is not permissible. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes with directions to the Assessing Officer to decide the issue afresh in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>