https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296369 The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the CAT and High Court, ruling that CRPF personnel posted in the North Eastern Region were entitled to Special (Duty) Allowance for the entire period of their posting. The classification based on Headquarters location was found unconstitutional under Article 14 of the Constitution. The allowance was to be granted retrospectively from the date of the respondents' postings, not just from the issuance of the clarificatory Office Memorandum in 2005. The appeal was dismissed. en-us Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jul 2021 07:26:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296369 The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the CAT and High Court, ruling that CRPF personnel posted in the North Eastern Region were entitled to Special (Duty) Allowance for the entire period of their posting. The classification based on Headquarters location was found unconstitutional under Article 14 of the Constitution. The allowance was to be granted retrospectively from the date of the respondents' postings, not just from the issuance of the clarificatory Office Memorandum in 2005. The appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296369