<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 890 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296370</link>
    <description>A special compulsory-retirement rule for intelligence personnel is discussed as a non-penal service measure designed to protect security and exposure concerns, with its terms construed as intelligible in context and its pensionary clause read beneficially. The note also addresses the validity of a retirement decision made on the basis of complaint material, internal consideration and higher-level approval, and it states that pensionary protection under the special rule operates separately from the general pension rules. It further notes that delayed and insensitive handling of a sexual-harassment complaint may justify public law compensation, while a court will not direct amendment of departmental rules to prescribe a particular procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2021 07:26:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 890 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296370</link>
      <description>A special compulsory-retirement rule for intelligence personnel is discussed as a non-penal service measure designed to protect security and exposure concerns, with its terms construed as intelligible in context and its pensionary clause read beneficially. The note also addresses the validity of a retirement decision made on the basis of complaint material, internal consideration and higher-level approval, and it states that pensionary protection under the special rule operates separately from the general pension rules. It further notes that delayed and insensitive handling of a sexual-harassment complaint may justify public law compensation, while a court will not direct amendment of departmental rules to prescribe a particular procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>