<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (6) TMI 8 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25989</link>
    <description>An association of persons is not an individual and, on the earlier Division Bench view applied here, is not chargeable to wealth-tax under the Wealth-tax Act. On that legal footing, the basis for reopening the assessment under section 17 was absent, because the petitioner association did not fall within the class of persons sought to be taxed. The notices issued under section 17 were therefore unsustainable, and the challenge to the reopening succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (6) TMI 8 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25989</link>
      <description>An association of persons is not an individual and, on the earlier Division Bench view applied here, is not chargeable to wealth-tax under the Wealth-tax Act. On that legal footing, the basis for reopening the assessment under section 17 was absent, because the petitioner association did not fall within the class of persons sought to be taxed. The notices issued under section 17 were therefore unsustainable, and the challenge to the reopening succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>