<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 649 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409807</link>
    <description>The High Court found that the complaint was filed prematurely under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the prescribed timelines, setting aside the convictions and sentences, discharging the petitioner from bail bonds, and allowing the revision petition. The court clarified the legal position on the service of notice and the filing of complaints, referencing relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:28:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 649 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409807</link>
      <description>The High Court found that the complaint was filed prematurely under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the prescribed timelines, setting aside the convictions and sentences, discharging the petitioner from bail bonds, and allowing the revision petition. The court clarified the legal position on the service of notice and the filing of complaints, referencing relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>