<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 646 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409804</link>
    <description>The court dismissed a batch of 19 Writ Petitions seeking acceptance of tax remittance under Form SVLDRS-3 by the Designated Committee under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme. Despite a deadline extension due to COVID-19, the petitions were filed 10 months late without sufficient justification, leading to their dismissal without costs. The judgment emphasizes timely compliance with remittance deadlines and the importance of valid justifications for delays in legal filings under the Scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:28:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 646 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409804</link>
      <description>The court dismissed a batch of 19 Writ Petitions seeking acceptance of tax remittance under Form SVLDRS-3 by the Designated Committee under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme. Despite a deadline extension due to COVID-19, the petitions were filed 10 months late without sufficient justification, leading to their dismissal without costs. The judgment emphasizes timely compliance with remittance deadlines and the importance of valid justifications for delays in legal filings under the Scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>