<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 644 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409802</link>
    <description>The court allowed the application for exemption from filing certified copies of annexures and swiftly disposed of the matter. In the main issue, the court directed the Adjudicating Authority to permit the petitioner to cross-examine six witnesses, emphasizing the importance of cooperation and avoiding unnecessary adjournments. The writ petition was allowed, quashing and setting aside the impugned order of 30.09.2020, providing relief to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:28:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 644 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409802</link>
      <description>The court allowed the application for exemption from filing certified copies of annexures and swiftly disposed of the matter. In the main issue, the court directed the Adjudicating Authority to permit the petitioner to cross-examine six witnesses, emphasizing the importance of cooperation and avoiding unnecessary adjournments. The writ petition was allowed, quashing and setting aside the impugned order of 30.09.2020, providing relief to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>