https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409784 The tribunal upheld the disallowance of expenses claimed by the assessee for property improvement and transfer of capital asset due to lack of evidence supporting their relevance. Additionally, it confirmed the levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Income Tax Act on the Non-Resident Individual (NRI) assessee for failure to ensure tax deductions at the source. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities. The judgment was delivered by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad on 13th July 2021. en-us Tue, 13 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:27:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409784 The tribunal upheld the disallowance of expenses claimed by the assessee for property improvement and transfer of capital asset due to lack of evidence supporting their relevance. Additionally, it confirmed the levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Income Tax Act on the Non-Resident Individual (NRI) assessee for failure to ensure tax deductions at the source. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities. The judgment was delivered by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad on 13th July 2021. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 13 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409784