<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1242 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296351</link>
    <description>Section 80P deduction for a co-operative society must be tested by a factual examination of the society&#039;s activities and the nature of the income attributable to them. The Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation treats section 80P as a beneficial provision to be construed liberally, with ambiguity resolved in favour of the assessee, while section 80P(4) excludes only co-operative banks engaged in banking business. Applying that approach, the deduction claim under section 80P(2)(a)(i) required fresh consideration on the facts. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for re-examination in line with the Supreme Court ruling, and the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 18:03:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1242 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296351</link>
      <description>Section 80P deduction for a co-operative society must be tested by a factual examination of the society&#039;s activities and the nature of the income attributable to them. The Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation treats section 80P as a beneficial provision to be construed liberally, with ambiguity resolved in favour of the assessee, while section 80P(4) excludes only co-operative banks engaged in banking business. Applying that approach, the deduction claim under section 80P(2)(a)(i) required fresh consideration on the facts. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for re-examination in line with the Supreme Court ruling, and the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>