https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296347 An appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed beyond 120 days was treated as not entertainable. The Court applied the same strict statutory discipline governing Section 34 proceedings to Section 37 appeals, reasoning that appellate proceedings are a continuation of the original proceedings. It held that allowing delay beyond the prescribed outer limit would undermine the legislative intent of securing expeditious resolution of arbitration matters. On the facts, the Special Leave Petitions were not entertained. en-us Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2022 09:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296347 An appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed beyond 120 days was treated as not entertainable. The Court applied the same strict statutory discipline governing Section 34 proceedings to Section 37 appeals, reasoning that appellate proceedings are a continuation of the original proceedings. It held that allowing delay beyond the prescribed outer limit would undermine the legislative intent of securing expeditious resolution of arbitration matters. On the facts, the Special Leave Petitions were not entertained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296347