<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (10) TMI 7 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25981</link>
    <description>Section 80-0 approval is not defeated merely because the assessee was not a direct party to the foreign contract, where the approved arrangement identifies the services and personnel, and the foreign enterprise has accepted the assessee&#039;s participation. The note also states that receipt of convertible foreign exchange through an Indian intermediary satisfies the statutory condition when the intermediary acts as the assessee&#039;s agent and holds the balance for remittance to the assessee. On that reasoning, absence of direct contractual privity does not bar approval, and foreign-exchange receipts routed through an agent remain eligible for the benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:07:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (10) TMI 7 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25981</link>
      <description>Section 80-0 approval is not defeated merely because the assessee was not a direct party to the foreign contract, where the approved arrangement identifies the services and personnel, and the foreign enterprise has accepted the assessee&#039;s participation. The note also states that receipt of convertible foreign exchange through an Indian intermediary satisfies the statutory condition when the intermediary acts as the assessee&#039;s agent and holds the balance for remittance to the assessee. On that reasoning, absence of direct contractual privity does not bar approval, and foreign-exchange receipts routed through an agent remain eligible for the benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>