<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 845 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Petition under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it did not demonstrate any apparent mistakes on record. The decision was made on the basis that the petition sought re-appreciation of evidence, which is not permissible under the law. The Tribunal emphasized that rectification is only allowed for clear and patent errors, not debatable legal points. The judgment was delivered on May 25, 2012, in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:44:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 845 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Petition under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it did not demonstrate any apparent mistakes on record. The decision was made on the basis that the petition sought re-appreciation of evidence, which is not permissible under the law. The Tribunal emphasized that rectification is only allowed for clear and patent errors, not debatable legal points. The judgment was delivered on May 25, 2012, in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>