https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409753 The Delhi HC considered whether GNCTD and other respondents should adopt the reimbursement modality used by Haryana and Gujarat for IGST collected on the equipment and articles covered by the notifications on record. No final adjudication was made. The matter was adjourned, with directions for filing counter-affidavits and for GNCTD to obtain instructions on the proposed modality. en-us Tue, 06 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409753 The Delhi HC considered whether GNCTD and other respondents should adopt the reimbursement modality used by Haryana and Gujarat for IGST collected on the equipment and articles covered by the notifications on record. No final adjudication was made. The matter was adjourned, with directions for filing counter-affidavits and for GNCTD to obtain instructions on the proposed modality. Case-Laws GST Tue, 06 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409753