<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 583 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and reinstating the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal stressed the requirement for conclusive evidence to verify the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share applicants. It upheld the AO&#039;s comprehensive investigation and findings, emphasizing the importance of meeting the evidentiary burden in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 583 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and reinstating the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal stressed the requirement for conclusive evidence to verify the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share applicants. It upheld the AO&#039;s comprehensive investigation and findings, emphasizing the importance of meeting the evidentiary burden in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>