<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 575 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409733</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act. The penalty notice was deemed invalid due to lack of specificity in specifying grounds for penalty initiation, following legal precedents. The Tribunal directed deletion of the penalty considering unintentional income omission, upholding the assessee&#039;s case on legal and merits aspects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 08:04:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 575 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409733</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act. The penalty notice was deemed invalid due to lack of specificity in specifying grounds for penalty initiation, following legal precedents. The Tribunal directed deletion of the penalty considering unintentional income omission, upholding the assessee&#039;s case on legal and merits aspects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>