https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409723 The Tribunal rejected the Petitioner's application to call an Extraordinary General Meeting (EOGM) under Section 98 of the Companies Act, 2013, directing them to follow the procedure under Section 100 instead. The Petitioner, holding 20% shareholding, had not requisitioned the EOGM as per Section 100(2) and could still call it under Section 100(1) due to the pending resignation. The Tribunal noted unresolved shareholding and directorship disputes, emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions and dismissing the impracticality argument. The application was disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 06 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Jul 2021 08:03:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409723 The Tribunal rejected the Petitioner's application to call an Extraordinary General Meeting (EOGM) under Section 98 of the Companies Act, 2013, directing them to follow the procedure under Section 100 instead. The Petitioner, holding 20% shareholding, had not requisitioned the EOGM as per Section 100(2) and could still call it under Section 100(1) due to the pending resignation. The Tribunal noted unresolved shareholding and directorship disputes, emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions and dismissing the impracticality argument. The application was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 06 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409723