<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (4) TMI 13 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25969</link>
    <description>Purchasing paddy from members, milling it and selling rice on the society&#039;s own account was held not to amount to marketing the agricultural produce of members, so deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(iii) was denied. The court treated the activity as a purchase-and-sale transaction by the society rather than member-produce marketing. By contrast, amounts compulsorily transferred to the reserve fund under the Co-operative Societies Act were treated as diverted by overriding title, because the statutory transfer placed the sum beyond the society&#039;s control before it became disposable income. That amount was therefore allowable as a deduction in computing business income, producing a mixed tax result.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:31:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (4) TMI 13 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25969</link>
      <description>Purchasing paddy from members, milling it and selling rice on the society&#039;s own account was held not to amount to marketing the agricultural produce of members, so deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(iii) was denied. The court treated the activity as a purchase-and-sale transaction by the society rather than member-produce marketing. By contrast, amounts compulsorily transferred to the reserve fund under the Co-operative Societies Act were treated as diverted by overriding title, because the statutory transfer placed the sum beyond the society&#039;s control before it became disposable income. That amount was therefore allowable as a deduction in computing business income, producing a mixed tax result.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>