<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (4) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25968</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the sum of Rs. 22.5 lakhs receivable from the U.K. company was not income but a casual and windfall gift. Additionally, the Rs. 22.5 lakhs credited to the profit and loss account did not accrue as income during the relevant year, as the actual payment was received in subsequent years. The Court emphasized that the payment lacked the character of income and referenced relevant case law to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:28:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (4) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25968</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the sum of Rs. 22.5 lakhs receivable from the U.K. company was not income but a casual and windfall gift. Additionally, the Rs. 22.5 lakhs credited to the profit and loss account did not accrue as income during the relevant year, as the actual payment was received in subsequent years. The Court emphasized that the payment lacked the character of income and referenced relevant case law to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>