<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 525 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409683</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Single Judge&#039;s decision to quash the CBDT&#039;s order and condone the delay in filing the return. The court stressed a liberal interpretation of &#039;genuine hardship,&#039; criticized the CBDT for assessing the return&#039;s merits, and preserved the revenue&#039;s scrutiny rights by adjusting the limitation period. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 525 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409683</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Single Judge&#039;s decision to quash the CBDT&#039;s order and condone the delay in filing the return. The court stressed a liberal interpretation of &#039;genuine hardship,&#039; criticized the CBDT for assessing the return&#039;s merits, and preserved the revenue&#039;s scrutiny rights by adjusting the limitation period. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>