https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409682 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was treated as not maintainable where the alleged offence under Section 132 of the CGST Act was stated to be bailable because the quantum involved was below the statutory threshold. On the respondent's memo conceding bailability, the court proceeded on the basis that anticipatory relief was not the appropriate remedy for a bailable offence and disposed of the petition accordingly. The petitioners also undertook to appear before the Commissioner and cooperate with the investigation, on which basis the interim bail application was held not to survive for consideration. en-us Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409682 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was treated as not maintainable where the alleged offence under Section 132 of the CGST Act was stated to be bailable because the quantum involved was below the statutory threshold. On the respondent's memo conceding bailability, the court proceeded on the basis that anticipatory relief was not the appropriate remedy for a bailable offence and disposed of the petition accordingly. The petitioners also undertook to appear before the Commissioner and cooperate with the investigation, on which basis the interim bail application was held not to survive for consideration. Case-Laws GST Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409682