<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 518 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409676</link>
    <description>A dispute over whether the agreed unit price could be unilaterally reduced because of a GST rate cut fell within the arbitration clause covering disputes arising out of or in connection with the contract. The court treated the issue as a live contractual controversy involving rights and liabilities, not a merely administrative matter. On that basis, the dispute was held arbitrable, and the petitioner&#039;s request for appointment of a sole arbitrator was maintainable after the respondent did not accept the nomination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 06:28:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 518 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409676</link>
      <description>A dispute over whether the agreed unit price could be unilaterally reduced because of a GST rate cut fell within the arbitration clause covering disputes arising out of or in connection with the contract. The court treated the issue as a live contractual controversy involving rights and liabilities, not a merely administrative matter. On that basis, the dispute was held arbitrable, and the petitioner&#039;s request for appointment of a sole arbitrator was maintainable after the respondent did not accept the nomination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>