<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 514 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409672</link>
    <description>Full and true disclosure of undisclosed income is a mandatory condition for invoking settlement jurisdiction, and a later revision or enlargement of the disclosure cannot cure an incomplete application. The Madras High Court noted that the income ultimately determined by the Settlement Commission substantially exceeded the income disclosed in the settlement applications, showing a failure of the statutory precondition. On that basis, the Court held that the Commission was not justified in entertaining the applications, granting settlement reliefs, or extending consequential immunity, and the impugned settlement orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 514 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409672</link>
      <description>Full and true disclosure of undisclosed income is a mandatory condition for invoking settlement jurisdiction, and a later revision or enlargement of the disclosure cannot cure an incomplete application. The Madras High Court noted that the income ultimately determined by the Settlement Commission substantially exceeded the income disclosed in the settlement applications, showing a failure of the statutory precondition. On that basis, the Court held that the Commission was not justified in entertaining the applications, granting settlement reliefs, or extending consequential immunity, and the impugned settlement orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>