<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 510 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409668</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ordering the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271AA. It was determined that only one transaction qualified as a specified domestic transaction under section 40A(2)(b), which did not exceed the specified limit. As a result, the transactions in question did not meet the criteria for SDTs, leading to the removal of penalties under sections 92D, 92E, and 271AA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 06:27:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 510 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409668</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ordering the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271AA. It was determined that only one transaction qualified as a specified domestic transaction under section 40A(2)(b), which did not exceed the specified limit. As a result, the transactions in question did not meet the criteria for SDTs, leading to the removal of penalties under sections 92D, 92E, and 271AA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>