<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 509 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409667</link>
    <description>The forum dismissed the appeal, upholding the denial of the Duty refund to the appellant. It was found that the appellant had committed an offence through mis-declaration, resulting in fines and penalties. The appellant&#039;s payment of the fines and penalties without contesting their legality, along with the failure to challenge key observations, weakened their position. The forum emphasized that the appellant&#039;s actions did not support their claim for a refund, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 06:27:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 509 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409667</link>
      <description>The forum dismissed the appeal, upholding the denial of the Duty refund to the appellant. It was found that the appellant had committed an offence through mis-declaration, resulting in fines and penalties. The appellant&#039;s payment of the fines and penalties without contesting their legality, along with the failure to challenge key observations, weakened their position. The forum emphasized that the appellant&#039;s actions did not support their claim for a refund, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>