<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 495 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409653</link>
    <description>Under TNMM, comparability depends on close functional similarity and available segmental data. A service-oriented passenger and baggage handling provider was contrasted with a logistics and freight-based entity lacking segmental accounts and showing materially different asset intensity and business model; that entity was therefore not a valid comparable. A company deriving substantial revenue from warehousing, equipment hire and other non-service activities, without segmental accounts, was likewise treated as not functionally comparable. The transfer pricing computation also required a uniform operating treatment of fringe benefit tax for both the tested party and the comparables, so the profit level indicator had to be recomputed on a consistent basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 06:26:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 495 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409653</link>
      <description>Under TNMM, comparability depends on close functional similarity and available segmental data. A service-oriented passenger and baggage handling provider was contrasted with a logistics and freight-based entity lacking segmental accounts and showing materially different asset intensity and business model; that entity was therefore not a valid comparable. A company deriving substantial revenue from warehousing, equipment hire and other non-service activities, without segmental accounts, was likewise treated as not functionally comparable. The transfer pricing computation also required a uniform operating treatment of fringe benefit tax for both the tested party and the comparables, so the profit level indicator had to be recomputed on a consistent basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>