<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 484 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409642</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to confirm disallowances and additions made by the assessing officer for alleged non-genuine purchases in multiple assessment years. Despite the assessee&#039;s submission of documentary evidence, the assessing officer and Commissioner remained unconvinced, leading to the dismissal of appeals due to profit element estimations. The Tribunal found the decision consistent with previous cases and upheld the disallowances based on available evidence and legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 06:25:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 484 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409642</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to confirm disallowances and additions made by the assessing officer for alleged non-genuine purchases in multiple assessment years. Despite the assessee&#039;s submission of documentary evidence, the assessing officer and Commissioner remained unconvinced, leading to the dismissal of appeals due to profit element estimations. The Tribunal found the decision consistent with previous cases and upheld the disallowances based on available evidence and legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>