<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1556 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296298</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected Deccan&#039;s resolution plan due to misrepresentation, non-disclosure of material facts, and unviability based on new information. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) was upheld in invoking the Bid Bond Guarantee, but unable to compel Deccan to implement the plan. Fresh bids were ordered to prevent liquidation of the Corporate Debtor and explore other resolution options.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 06:25:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1556 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296298</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected Deccan&#039;s resolution plan due to misrepresentation, non-disclosure of material facts, and unviability based on new information. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) was upheld in invoking the Bid Bond Guarantee, but unable to compel Deccan to implement the plan. Fresh bids were ordered to prevent liquidation of the Corporate Debtor and explore other resolution options.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>