<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 706 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296289</link>
    <description>A proclamation under Section 82 CrPC is invalid unless the accused is given at least thirty days from publication to appear, and Section 83 action can follow only after a valid proclamation. The text explains that the statutory requirements of prior warrant, recorded satisfaction, and proper publication are mandatory, so a shorter appearance period defeats the proclamation. It also notes that a trial court cannot proceed on an assumed valid proclamation or make adverse observations contrary to a binding High Court order, as subordinate courts remain bound by precedent and judicial discipline. The challenged proceedings were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 15:38:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 706 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296289</link>
      <description>A proclamation under Section 82 CrPC is invalid unless the accused is given at least thirty days from publication to appear, and Section 83 action can follow only after a valid proclamation. The text explains that the statutory requirements of prior warrant, recorded satisfaction, and proper publication are mandatory, so a shorter appearance period defeats the proclamation. It also notes that a trial court cannot proceed on an assumed valid proclamation or make adverse observations contrary to a binding High Court order, as subordinate courts remain bound by precedent and judicial discipline. The challenged proceedings were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>