https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296287 Strict compliance with Section 87(1) and Section 87(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code was mandatory for proclamation and attachment proceedings, because the record did not show prior judicial satisfaction that the accused had absconded and the publication requirements were not fully met; the proceedings were therefore illegal and vitiated. The remedy under Section 88(6-D) was only alternative, not exclusive, so it did not oust the High Court's revisional jurisdiction, and procedural breach remained open to revision. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remitted for fresh disposal from the earlier stage, without any finding on title. en-us Thu, 01 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jul 2021 15:17:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296287 Strict compliance with Section 87(1) and Section 87(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code was mandatory for proclamation and attachment proceedings, because the record did not show prior judicial satisfaction that the accused had absconded and the publication requirements were not fully met; the proceedings were therefore illegal and vitiated. The remedy under Section 88(6-D) was only alternative, not exclusive, so it did not oust the High Court's revisional jurisdiction, and procedural breach remained open to revision. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remitted for fresh disposal from the earlier stage, without any finding on title. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296287